April 2008


Just a couple of months ago I received the neuropsychologist’s report from the assessment she did on eleven year old Seth late last year.

Six pages into the report which detailed the assorted cognitive areas she tested I read the words I’ve been expecting for years….

Seth’s profile can be most explained by alcohol related neurodevelopmental disorder [ARND]….

Apparently a definitive diagnosis cannot be given without confirmation of maternal substance abuse. Although there is no doubt his mother drank heavily throughout the pregnancy, we don’t have written evidence of this.

But here at last is an explanation for all the difficulties Seth has experienced throughout his school years and hopefully I can now say to teachers and any others who have contact with my son, “this child has fetal alcohol brain damage, this is how it has effected him, and this is what you need to do to ensure he has the best opportunity to learn” (and hope they will listen to me).

When Seth entered our lives barely six weeks old and less than seven pounds, despite being born pretty close to full term, we had no idea of the distress and joy this little boy would bring to our family. It started as a one week voluntary placement by parents both suffering from alcohol dependency who were unable to deal with the constant crying of their baby suffering from alcohol withdrawal. One week turned to two, then Human Services became involved as the parents weren’t attending access visits or responding to the social worker’s calls. Weeks turned to months and Seth saw his family only twice after entering care. They eventually faded out of his life altogether. I have had some written correspondence with his mother. I think she is glad her little boy is in a safe, loving home away from the alcoholism and domestic violence that would otherwise have been his experience.

I was the one to take baby Seth to the Children’s Hospital to test for Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS). The geneticist who performed the examination reported that although he didn’t feel that Seth had the facial appearance consistent with FAS, his small size and the history of alcohol exposure were very suggestive of it. Six months later a pediatrician’s report stated that Seth was

at moderate to high risk of having some difficulties associated with FAS/E [Fetal Alcohol Syndrome/Effects].

By this stage Seth’s early distress and dysregulation had abated and he was now a sweet, happy almost one year old who had a special spot in our family. We applied for Permanent Care so he could remain in our family forever. Whatever the future brought, we would be there for him.

During his infancy and preschool years Seth demonstrated timely development in most areas with a few problems around speech and, later, fine motor control. As we accessed services to help him in these areas I continually questioned the possibility of fetal alcohol effects, but the professionals did not seem to know their stuff too well. Replies were usually like “but he doesn’t have the FAS look” or “He’s bright enough, he has a normal IQ” and at age four and a half he did fall within the average cognitive range when tested with the WPPSI-R (a common preschool IQ test). We continued to attend to individual difficulties as they arose.

Preschool and the early years of primary school went along smoothly enough. Seth was always a little behind his peers in any academic areas, but he was a sweet responsive boy who caused no trouble in school so he didn’t attract attention. I noticed he was harder to engage in reading and word games, number puzzles and suchlike than the older kids had been. But he was an active boy who loved bike riding and climbing and performing handstands and cartwheels along the footpath, so his resistance to anything requiring brain power just seemed part of his personality.

By the time he was eight or nine however, we started to notice some puzzling aspects about Seth. Not only was he not learning to tell the time, he didn’t even seem very aware of the time throughout the day, unsure whether it had been lunchtime yet, or when it was time to come inside at the end of the day. Even the seasons and months of the year seemed to baffle him. Time spent on simple maths facts and times tables while walking to school or driving in the car were repeated day after day, with no sense of him getting it. What is more he was less cooperative about spending time on these activities and sought ways to avoid them. At school his teacher found him reluctant to try new activities, hard to motivate and hard to keep on task.

We organised for an educational assessment to be done when Seth was nine and a half and at the end of third grade. It indicated his IQ was in the low average range and that he had some specific learning difficulties in reading and spelling with poor visual memory and weak processing speed. The report concluded with a number of recommendations and suggested classroom strategies which I was able to take back to the teacher. Over the following school year some individual intervention in phonic based reading was provided at school and at home I put him through a similar phoneme based program called Phono-graphix. We did see a little improvement but by the end of grade four Seth had slipped even further behind his peers in all academic areas.

At this point I was really starting to feel concerned for my little boy, now ten and a half years old. Not just because he was doing poorly academically, but I could see his self esteem falling too, and he was often frustrated and confused in the classroom. Some behaviour problems were also starting to emerge in that Seth was becoming a little defiant at school and would sometimes run off from teachers when they were disciplining him. I had a few discussions with the Principal but felt that the school was not able to meet his needs. But then I wasn’t really sure what his needs were.

As Seth started fifth grade I felt trepidation for the coming year. He seemed unsettled, complained about not being able to do the work, told me he was dumber than the other kids and chose to work at home with me regularly (over the years we had often had the occasional ‘home schooling’ day to give him a bit of a break from the daily grind of school) . After an interview with his teacher, who had taught him the previous two years and was really concerned for how difficult he was finding school and how much he was dragging behind his peers, I made the decision to withdraw him from school for a while to try full time home schooling, and pursue a diagnosis of a Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) in the hope of finding some answers to the difficulties he was experiencing.

That was one year ago. Home schooling was not completely successful. Seth changed his mind so many times. He would remember the fun times, break times out in the playground with his friends, socialising in class, friends that helped him with his work and he’d forget how discouraged and frustrated he’d been.

Sometimes he would beg me to let him go back to school. He would nag and nag all day, completely unable to focus on any activity, fall apart in my arms, but I knew returning to the state school was not the answer. Their overworked teachers, large classes of 28 kids and lack of interventionist resources meant they could not meet Seth’s needs. If he let me, I knew we could be successful with home schooling, but he resisted most days. He was difficult to motivate, needed my constant attention to get a task completed, refused to get involved with local home schooling groups and hated all the assessments the paediatrician was putting him through in our attempt to gain a diagnosis.

We were starting to doubt whether this was going to lead us anywhere but we stumbled upon a service that we hoped might give us the answers we were looking for. I’ll talk about this more in my next post.

So Angel wasn’t sent home at a moment’s notice – lucky, as I hadn’t packed all his clothes and toys.

In my heart I couldn’t believe the Magistrate would really do that to this little boy; just rip him from the family he knows and loves, to return to a Grandma who has become almost a stranger having barely seen him each month. He’s been given the one thing needed if this reunification attempt is not to traumatise him – time. We are now speaking in months. The next court case is scheduled for early June.

In the meantime regular, more frequent access has been court-ordered for Grandma. Next week she has two visits, each of two hours, three visits the following week, then increasing to four the week after that. One a week will be held at DHS and I have been invited to attend a part of that, which I willcertainly do. It can only help Angel to see me with Grandma, and I want to impart a little of his routine and his needs to her if I can. The other access visits will be at her place which will enable Angel to become familiar with the home he left almost nine months ago and the other members of the family. This includes his mum and two older sibs so there are many people to get used to again.

At the end of four weeks the transition will be reviewed to make sure Grandma is abiding by the guidelines and demonstrating her commitment to her grandson. I guess if she doesn’t seem to be complying the plan for reunification will be reassessed. I hope she comes through with flying colours. I need her to, to be able to believe that going home is in Angel’s best interests.

All kids belong with their family, and if that family doesn’t meet my ideals of the very best family for that child, who am I to judge? I did have a little dream, when Angel’s birth family moved off the scene for a bit, of him moving on to a loving “permanent care family”. Whenever he was at his most charming and cute (and he’s very good at that) I imagined how delighted his new mum and dad would be adding him to their family. I’ve participated in transitions to adoptive and permanent families in the past.  Although it’s always difficult farewelling a child who’s been yours for so long, the outcomes for both the child and families have always been excellent, and I look back at all of them very positively.

Angel returning home means a shift in my projective thoughts. I can do that (well I hardly have a choice do I; I’m the foster mum). Not knowing the family at all makes it more difficult, so I’ll be pushing for more contact over the next month, and hope I can develop some rapport with Grandma, even though we don’t speak the same language.

I don’t anticipate having contact with the family after reunification (as I still do with one little girl who left my care five years ago, but still regularly stays with us, and is truly still my little girl) but I would like to have a positive image of Angel within his home and family to help me cope with him going.

Angel’s family have been given their chance. I’m on the sidelines watching, hoping they do a good job of it, so my heart is easier when the day finally comes when I have to hand my sweet little boy back to them.

Or should I say, insufficient plans for Angel’s reunification with his birth family.

There is a strong possibility that Angel will be returned to his grandmother’s custody this week. At present she is only seeing him every few weeks for a one hour supervised access along with other family members. With the possibility of him returning to her care it was suggested to her that access be arranged on a daily basis leading up to the court case, so if the decision is made to send him home at least she will be a little more familiar to him. But she refused, on the basis that she cared for him his first three months, has been seeing him since, and knows him. But how can he know her?

For the last eight and a half months Angel has been in my care and, as would be expected, has formed a strong attachment with me. For the last few months the feeling at his care plan meetings was that there was a strong likelihood he would not be moving back to family and that we should be pushing for permanency plans to be made. His birth mum showed no signs of overcoming her dependency, and Angel’s grandmother was not wanting custody of the baby, being more than busy enough with his older siblings. Neither were taking full advantage of the scheduled twice weekly access visits; in fact sometimes four or five weeks went by between visits. Our concerns were to move Angel’s case plan from family reunification to Permanent Care, but each time it went to Court the outcome was yet another three week Interim Accommodation Order, even though D.H.S. (Department of Human Services) were pushing for a Custody Order.

Until just two weeks ago when the Magistrate refused to roll over the Interim Accommodation Order, claiming that Angel should not be in foster care as there was no significant risk to him at home. The Magistrate directed that we send him home that day. Fortunately the D.H.S. worker managed to convince her that it wasn’t in Angel’s best interests to be returned home with no transition, having not even seen Grandma for almost two months, so we were granted till the next scheduled Court hearing to make plans for his reunification.

D.H.S. workers are trying to make these plans believing if we end up with the same Magistrate she’ll send Angel home the very same day. But Grandma obviously doesn’t have a great understanding of how attachment works (most people don’t) and doesn’t seem keen to learn. What is more she has never worked well with D.H.S. workers so they haven’t had much chance to explain to her how important it is for Angel to have time to begin attaching to her while he’s still secure in his placement with me. Being of a different culture and language with little understanding of English doesn’t help communication efforts either.

I had planned to attend some of those extra access visits too so Angel could see me interacting with Grandma, maybe talking and laughing with her, the two of us playing with him together, so the little guy could see that I approved of and liked Grandma. Then when he found himself living with her, and no sign of me anywhere, he’d hopefully feel ok to love her, because he somehow remembered the two of us together in a positive way.

Now those plans have to be set aside.

Who’s to say Grandma will bother to come to any access now until the Court hearing. Meanwhile I just keep on caring for Angel, giving him all the love he needs, hoping that the last eight months in our care has built up his resilience to help him through this difficult time ahead for him.

I can hardly blame the Grandmother – she just wants her grandson back – but I hope the Court’s guiding principle of acting “in the best interests of the child” win out and we can make a gentle transition for him back to his family. I can’t make myself feel ok about Angel returning home, but I would at least like the opportunity to make such a big change for him happen the best way it can.